That's what confuses me about fur...
Spread the Word had someone comment on the fact that they are coming to the anti-fur campaign shoot that i am holding yet they feel ok wearing vintage fur, and that its the new fur that is the problem to them.
Here is wear my disappointment is...the term " I'd Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur' doesn't come with a vintage clause...if you are coming to the shoot, you are saying NO to fur for the rest of your life. NO you will never wear fur ever again!
Now my question is why else are you taking your clothes off...is it something that you want to prove or say that you have done it in your life time? Why would you take off your clothes to protest of the skinning of animals and then go home and wear fur..WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU?
It agitates me because people cannot make the connection with fluffy soft fur and an animals epithelial cells...
This is the hard truth... YOU ARE WEARING SOMETHING DEAD!!!
In order to get alluring fur you have to take a life.....get that....
FUR= -1 LIFE
and unfortunately in almost all cases, that life is taken with the worst hurting, traumatic, savage intent ever!
So lets try this with a bit of math, and you'll see why the fact that the lost connection between death and fur is strange to me...
FUR= - 1 LIFE
Now look at how much fur you need...
RACCOON LONG SLEEVE COAT -
ARMS - -2 LIVES
BACK - -4 LIVES
FRONT - -4 LIVES
HOOD - -2 LIVES
A REGULAR MOTHER HAS 2-5 KIDS AND MALES HANG OUT IN NURSERY'S OF 4.
A COAT = -12 LIVES
THAT'S 2 MOTHERS 6 KIDS AND 4 MALES- DEAD
THAT'S MORE THAN ONE NURSERY!
Therefore - IN THE TERMS OF FUR... THE COMMON ENTITY HERE IS LIVES AND AT A MINUS FACTOR YOUR LOOKING AT LIVES LOST WHICH WOULD INTERN GIVES YOU DEATH BECAUSE WHEN A LIVE IS LOST SOMEONE HAS DIED.
In conclusion - FUR= DEATH
And if it's vintage....it's still death.It's just dated death, and that sure as hell doesn't mean its less painful.
So take off your dead being and get and give a life!
Nighty
Kindness and Hope
Kelly-Leigh
No comments:
Post a Comment